The Rayong oil spill occurred on July 27, 2013, in the Gulf of Thailand, off the coast of Ko Samet and Map Ta Phut in Rayong Province.[1]

Occasion
[edit]
On July 27, 2013, a pipeline owned by PTTGC Plc, a Thai state-owned oil company, burst while oil was being transferred from an undersea effectively to a tanker. The corporate used boats and airplanes to spray oil-spill dispersants, 0,612 litres of Slickgone NS and 6,930 litres of Super-Dispersant 25, which are permitted by the Division of Pollution Control to be utilized in Thailand, because they have low toxicity, are biodegradable and do not bio-accumulate or cause mutation and degeneration. Nevertheless, the increase didn’t work nicely because of dangerous weather. [2] [1] PTTGC then adopted the operation procedures for oil spill administration. It released also a growth to contain the spilled oil within the realm.

On the evening of 28 July 2013, the oil leak (from a pipeline) 35 km (22 mi) from the seaside at Ko Samet’s Coconut Bay[3] (Ao Phrao) resulted in the seashore being closed and its vacationers evacuated, after spillage reached the seashore.[3][4] On four August 2013 media said that the crude oil spill had occurred 20 km (12 mi) off of Thailand’s mainland, “when a floating hose transferring oil from a tanker to a PTT refinery pipeline broke sending, PTT says, 50,000 L (310 bbl) of oil spewing into the coastal waters”.[5] Two beaches have been closed as a consequence of uncertainty about water toxicity. The inconsistent info launched. [6] Ko Samet is a popular tourist island, not removed from Bangkok, 10 km (6.2 mi) off the coast of Ban Phe‘, Rayong. Concerns have been rising concerning the oil spill.

Ko Samet is near Rayong and Map Ta Phut, and they’ve had a long history of environmental issues since they opened in 1990. About 25,000 folks reside within the Map Ta Phut municipality. An impartial test carried out in 2005 demonstrated that airborne cancerous toxic chemicals launched by Map Ta Phut Industrial Estate exceeded safety requirements of developed nations by 60 to 3,000 occasions. [7] In 1997, the pollution got here to public consideration when 1,000 pupils and teachers at an area college suffered from illnesses after inhaling toxic emissions and had to be hospitalized.

The oil spill is partly related to the oil operations at Map Ta Phut. Anthony Zola, an American environmental guide is reported to have mentioned “In rural areas, there is sort of no enforcement in any respect. Water pollution, air pollution, noise pollution-you may make all the complaints you need, and nobody pays any consideration to you.” Map Ta Phut was closed down in 2009 by the earlier Prime Minister, Abhisit Vejjaijiva as a consequence of security concerns. The new York Times reported “Even among critics of the court choices, there may be widespread agreement that Map Ta Phut is heavily polluted and unhealthy for those who live close by. However environmental specialists stay skeptical that the court docket decisions will fix the problem.”

Two days after the oil spill was found, PTT closed their War Room down in keeping with Bangkok Put up, and they have persistently since then tried to play down the results of the spill. Greenpeace is concerned with using dispersants and the oil has sunk to the bottom and the complete results of the spill have yet to be understood. Some folks swimming within the sea have reported dizziness. Bangkok Submit reported “In 2012, a examine discovered that Corexit increases the toxicity of oil by 52 times. It might probably stay in the ecological meals chain for a few years and cause widespread and lengthy-lasting well being impacts.” The dispersants also have adverse effects and could cause cancers, kidney and liver problems. Per week later they were saying it was protected to go to the seaside and that it was clear. Mercury ranges have additionally been reported to be 21 instances secure limits.

[6] [8] [9] [7] [10] [11]

Estimates
[edit]
Official stories said 50,000 L (310 bbl) of oil had been spilled, however critics of the oil firm and the federal government say that the spill was much bigger and warned of health dangers posed each by the spill and by the chemicals getting used to disperse the oil.[12]

A higher estimate of the oil spill has been performed by Somporn Chuai-aree of Prince Songkhla University: “as little as 108,000 L (680 bbl) or as excessive as 190,000 L (1,200 bbl)”.[5] This estimate is believed by associate professor Siwat Pongniumchan from the National Institute of Growth Administration (Nida), who disbelieves previous estimates.[5]

Effects
[edit]
Tourism operators and officials were concerned about the consequences on tourism in the world, as beaches in Rayong and on the close by resort island of Ko Samet were impacted.[13][14]

A 14 August 2013 Bangkok Put up article stated that “Fishery Division director-normal Wimol Jantrarotai said Chulalongkorn College lab exams on seafood discovered metallic contamination in samples from fish markets close to Koh Samet.”[15]

The oil firm’s data sheet given to media (on the seashore) on 31 July, stated that the oil dispersant used is “Slickgone NS”.[13]

On 30 July 2013 Bangkok Post stated that “authorities and more than 500 PTT workers have been struggling to prevent the slick spreading at the beach. They have tried to comprise the spill, which has stretched virtually 1 km (0.62 mi) along the bay, using containment booms to stop further environmental injury in the area.”[16]

A 14 August 2013 Bangkok Publish article said that “mercury levels present in sea water off Ao Phrao beach on Koh Samet were 29 times increased than security standards allow, in line with the Pollution Control Division.[15] Furthermore “Niphon Phungsuwan, a marine professional from the Division of Marine and Coastal Resources, said greater than 70% of coral at Ao Phrao had been bleached.”

Bangkok Put up reviews “PTTGC has remained silent about what chemicals it is using but also mentioned they could pose a hazard to the atmosphere and other people’s health.”[17] In 2012, a research found that Corexit increases the toxicity of oil by fifty two instances. As of 20 August 2013, vacationers are advisable to make use of warning if and when going swimming in the water, and to be careful of seafood for now. It may well stay within the ecological food chain for a few years and trigger widespread and long-lasting health impacts. [17] Some folks swimming close to Ko Samet have reported dizziness, and two beaches have been closed. Swimming is just not advisable till extra is known and the total environmental impacts have been independently verified. “Using dispersants is a solution that creates new and worse problems,” Ms Arpa stated. The principle components of Corexit embrace 2-Butoxyethanol which may comprise up to 60% of the dispersant and is thought to hurt the blood, kidneys, liver and central nervous system. They need to report dizziness of feeling unwell to the relevant authorities or to their embassy.

On 31 August 2013 Bangkok Put up said that the level of whole petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) “still exceeds safety standards”.[18]

Insurance coverage
[edit]
On 30 July 2013 Bangkok Post stated that “The corporate PTTGC has insurance coverage protection of US$50 million with Dhipaya Insurance coverage.”

PTT Public Firm Limited

Listing of oil spills

^ a b “Oil spill threatens Rayong beaches”. www.bangkokpost.com. Bangkok Submit. 28 July 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.

^ Investigation committee confirms oil slick quantity of 54,000 litres, PTTGC follows operation procedure, affordable volume of dispersant used.

^ a b Maierbrugger, Arno (31 July 2013). “Thai oil spill: Romantic island is ‘catastrophe zone’ (video)”. Inside Investor. Retrieved 31 July 2013.

^ Put up Publishing PCL. “Work gangs battle to wash oil slick from seaside at in style Koh Samet island in Rayong – Bangkok Publish: news”. bangkokpost.com. Retrieved 24 March 2015.

^ a b c Publish Publishing PCL. “No slick rationalization for large PTT oil spill”. bangkokpost.com. Retrieved 24 March 2015.cite net: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)

^ a b “PCD delays disclosure of results on Samet water”. The Nation. Sixteen August 2013. Archived from the original on August 17, 2013. Retrieved 24 March 2015.

^ a b “The environmental problems at Map Ta Phut – Asian Correspondent”. Retrieved 24 March 2015.

^ Oil spill hits Koh Samet Island

^ Put up Publishing PCL. “Bangkok Post”. Retrieved 24 March 2015.

^ “12 killed in Map Ta Phut chemical fireplace in Thailand – Asian Correspondent”. Retrieved 24 March 2015.

^ Tim Hume and Kocha Olarn (31 July 2013). “Thailand Koh Samet seashore oil spill ‘threatens tourism, fishing industries’ – CNN.com”. CNN. Retrieved 24 March 2015.

^ “Oil spill spelling catastrophe for Rayong”. www.samuitimes.com. SamuiTimes.com. 29 July 2013. Retrieved 2 August 2013.

^ a b Sarnsamak, Pongphon (1 August 2013). “Public warned of air pollution brought on by Rayong oil spill”. Asia News Net. Retrieved 2 August 2013.

^ “Oil spill reaches Koh Samet’s Phrao Bay”. www.samuitimes.com. Samui Times newspaper. 29 July 2013. Retrieved 2 August 2013.

^ a b “Tests discover mercury in Ao Phrao sea water”. Bangkok Publish. 2013-08-14.

^ “PTTGC faces Samet spill authorized motion”. Bangkok Put up. 2013-08-30.

^ a b Publish Publishing PCL. “Alarm bells sound over oil spill dispersant use”. bangkokpost.com. Retrieved 24 March 2015.

^ Post Publishing PCL. “Chemicals linger off Koh Samet”. bangkokpost.com. Retrieved 24 March 2015.

Bangkok Submit’s images printed on 2 August 2013

Oil spill panel fails to win over public trust

Retrieved from “https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2013_Rayong_oil_spill&oldid=1351649976”

Oil spills in Asia

2013 industrial disasters

2013 within the surroundings

Rayong province

Man-made disasters in Thailand

Environmental issues in Thailand

2013 in Thailand

July 2013 in Thailand

2013 disasters in Thailand

CS1 maint: deprecated archival service

This web page was final edited on 29 April 2026, at 08:10 (UTC).

2013 Rayong oil spill